|
m230900
oMiser Articles |
|
Status |
Date |
Description |
|
| 2026-01-25 | If there is a bit on ob-cells to indicate possible value of a binding, that bit cannot be part of the Hash tag construction, because it is not inherent in the structure and origin of the ob-cell. So it can only be a hint, and it doesn't even indicate when it might be the value of more than one binding as well as no binding (any longer). While this might be solvable by another level of indirection. That's a scary prospect. | ||
|
in progress |
2025-10-24 | Look into pseudo-random generators as ways to generate hashes from other hashes. This would have the HashFlag be treated in some manner as (part of) the current state of an RNG with significant cyclicity. One of the diehard RNGs that have easy next-random procedures might work. GB_FLIP is not suitable in this situation. Also check Knuth on this. This will influence how big we want the HashFlag to be and how we place the Flag bits. [dh:2025-11-04: I an digging around in the Stanford GraphBase and the dieharder offered good RNGs and see how the hashflags can be taken as seeds to generate new ones, especially for pairs. For enclosures and synthetics, different RNG methods could be used. For named individuals, we have the hashing on names to be of assistance.] | |
| done | 2025-09-14 |
Create this this page from the hybridForm examplar |
|
| done | 2024-02-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
created 2025-09-14T19:48Z by orcmid |